For more info about the competition in which this clip was entered.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Equals
I can't believe it took a year and a half for this to make it around to my facebook newsfeed.
For more info about the competition in which this clip was entered.
For more info about the competition in which this clip was entered.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Local History: Women's Baseball leauge reunites in Syracuse!
I am so sorry I missed this. So cool that it was picked up by the AP and Title 9 Sports!
complete text
complete text
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The Title IX Olympics?
Title IX, which promotes gender equity in sports and other programs, recently celebrated its 40th anniversary. Is it a coincidence that in the same year, every national Olympic committee sent women to the Olympic Games. And women have done well, with US, Chinese and Russian women winning more gold and more medals than their powerhouse male teammates. Will this be the legacy of the 2012 games? Or the twitterverse commentary blasting All-Around gold medal gymnast's Gabby Douglas's hair (praytell, how do the haters manage their sweaty locks?) and admonishing British Clean and jerk weightlifting recordholder Zoe Smith for looking like a "bloke."
Zoe's responds that "We actually would rather be attractive to people who aren’t closed-minded and ignorant. Crazy, eh?! We, as any women with an ounce of self-confidence would, prefer our men to be confident enough in themselves to not feel emasculated by the fact that we aren’t weak and feeble." Complete text
I'd bet a whole lot of smart women--scientists, engineers, and environmental professionals among them--feel the same way.
Zoe's responds that "We actually would rather be attractive to people who aren’t closed-minded and ignorant. Crazy, eh?! We, as any women with an ounce of self-confidence would, prefer our men to be confident enough in themselves to not feel emasculated by the fact that we aren’t weak and feeble." Complete text
I'd bet a whole lot of smart women--scientists, engineers, and environmental professionals among them--feel the same way.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Local history: In Syracuse, it was one small change for infants, one large step toward equality
When I clicked on this story, I assumed it would be about today's Great Cloth Diaper Change, an attempt to break the world record for simultaneous cloth diaper changes. However, it addressed access to changing table; the first suit addressing the lack of facilities for fathers (and the assumption that only moms did this particular familial duty) was in 1985, about our very own Syracuse Hancock Airport. Read on.
Published in the Post-Standard, April 21, 2012
By Karen DeCrow, Contributing writer
Syracuse was ahead of the game!
In Miami, Fla., 165 diaper changing stations are being built in men’s rooms and common areas of city properties. A story by Charles Rabin in The Miami Herald reported city commissioners voted in February to spend $45,000 to install baby diaper-changing stations in men’s rooms across the city, “after an hour of heated argument between the measure’s sponsor and the disgruntled police union president.”
The model: a Syracuse lawsuit filed in federal court, establishing that changing diapers is no longer women’s work (Northern District of New York).
My client, the Fathers’ Rights Association of New York State, brought the Syracuse Department of Aviation to U.S. District Court in July 1985. In September 1986, thanks to a decision by the late Judge Howard Munson, there was a celebration of the opening of a gender-free fathers’ and mothers’ nursery, with a ribbon cutting and the changing of two infants by their fathers; one the son of the assistant corporation counsel, the other the son of the president of the fathers’ rights group.
Our lawsuit addressed: sex discrimination against men who were denied equal facilities; sex discrimination against women, who were assumed to have the total responsibility for children while traveling; and the rights of children to be cared for by both parents.
FULL STORY
Karen DeCrow, an attorney and author from Jamesville, NY, is in the National Women's Hall of Fame and writes an occasional column in The Post-Standard.
Published in the Post-Standard, April 21, 2012
By Karen DeCrow, Contributing writer
Syracuse was ahead of the game!
In Miami, Fla., 165 diaper changing stations are being built in men’s rooms and common areas of city properties. A story by Charles Rabin in The Miami Herald reported city commissioners voted in February to spend $45,000 to install baby diaper-changing stations in men’s rooms across the city, “after an hour of heated argument between the measure’s sponsor and the disgruntled police union president.”
The model: a Syracuse lawsuit filed in federal court, establishing that changing diapers is no longer women’s work (Northern District of New York).
My client, the Fathers’ Rights Association of New York State, brought the Syracuse Department of Aviation to U.S. District Court in July 1985. In September 1986, thanks to a decision by the late Judge Howard Munson, there was a celebration of the opening of a gender-free fathers’ and mothers’ nursery, with a ribbon cutting and the changing of two infants by their fathers; one the son of the assistant corporation counsel, the other the son of the president of the fathers’ rights group.
Our lawsuit addressed: sex discrimination against men who were denied equal facilities; sex discrimination against women, who were assumed to have the total responsibility for children while traveling; and the rights of children to be cared for by both parents.
FULL STORY
Karen DeCrow, an attorney and author from Jamesville, NY, is in the National Women's Hall of Fame and writes an occasional column in The Post-Standard.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Dr. Lillian Na’ai Alessa Speaks on Water, Technology, and Sustainability
Dr. Alessa brought humans to the
forefront in her discussion on water and technology on Tuesday, April 17, 2012,
where she not only brought powerful ideas on sustainability but also enthusiasm
and dry wit that kept the audience engaged and enlightened.
Dr.
Alessa works within the framework of Social Ecological Systems, a concept
noting that humans exist within a biophysical environment. Humans, she said,
are the drivers of land use change and have kept sustainability in an ivory
tower, but also possess the power to work with and adapt to the changing
environment. Her talk centered around the concept of adaptation and its use in
addressing the problem of climate change.
In particular, she framed her discussion around the use of place based
knowledge, the use of humans as environmental sensors, and the use of
technology as a tool, rather than the means to an end. Technology, she said, cannot be
engineered to apply everywhere.
Thus, by relying on our human sensors – our expert observers and
note-takers of places in which they live – researchers and scientists can
better use this place based knowledge in developing solutions and
policies.
Alessa’s talk concluded with a
discussion of some of the tools she and her team have developed in order to
document and analyze placed based knowledge. In particular, she explained a
software program called Architecture for Integrated and Dynamic Data Analysis
(AIDA) that collects social data information in order to map social values
across the landscape. She noted that AIDA is in essence a social networking
tool for information.
Dr. Lilian Na’ia Alessa is the
Director of the Resilience and Adaptive Management Group at the University of
Alaska in Anchorage. Dr. Alessa received her B.S. in general biology and her
Ph.D. in cell biology from the University of British Columbia. She has also
served on the board of the Arctic Research Consortium of the United States.
This talk was a joint presentation of SUNY ESF’s Women in Scientific and Environmental
Professions Seminar Series and the Cross-Disciplinary Seminar in Hydrology and Biogeochemical Processes. The seminar was sponsored by the Department
of Environmental and Forest Biology, the Graduate Student Association, and the
ESF Women’s Caucus.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Garland and Alestalo: Transforming Workplace Culture
As part of the requirements for FOR496/797, students share responsibility of reporting the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions Speaker Series. This was prepared by Brianna Reed
Dr.
Marie Garland, Executive Director for the NSF-ADVANCE initiative and Ms. Sharon
W. Alestalo, Program Manager for SU ADVANCE and WISE, presented their
experience on Advance: Transforming
Workplace Culture at ESF on Tuesday, February 7, 2012 as part of SUNY-ESF’s
Women in the Scientific and Environmental Professions Spring Seminar Series.
Dr. Garland
discussed recent headlines from news articles that focused on the need for more
women to enter careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM)
fields. There are many theories as to
why women have not gained gender equality in the STEM fields such as
institutional barriers and common stereotypes.
She used graphs to show the fact that women consistently choose not to
develop careers in engineering, mathematics and computer sciences, although
these amounts have been gradually increasing.
Sharon
Alestalo discussed the NSF-ADVANCE program that went into effect one year ago
at Syracuse University. This a program
funded to ensure women have a greater presence in STEM fields in the
university. She presented the current
statistics of the lack of women faculty in departments such as physics and
mathematics and showed that our values are low in comparison to national
figures. Alestalo discussed the four
main parts of the plan: Recruitment, Connect, Extend and Transform. Within these tactics, women will be connected
with mentors, have access to workshops and the males in each department will
also be engaged in the discussions and programs.
Alestalo
and Garland defined the success of the NSF-ADVANCE program to be flexible and
dependent on each department. An
external evaluator has been asked to oversee the progress of the program. Both Alestalo and Garland are excited to be a
part of the program and have high expectations that it will result in a large
achievement for the university culture.
Dr. Garland received her education
at the University of New Hampshire and Ohio State University. She has previously been a professor at Ithaca
College and was the Director of Faculty and Staff Diversity at Cornell
University. Sharon Alestalo received her
education at Chapman College and University of Albany. She has been the Executive Director at Girls
Incorporated of CNY, Director of Student Enrollment at OCC, Program manager of
the federal Health and Human Services Project at SU.
Friday, September 16, 2011
She said/he said/we said: how family talk sheds light on language and gender-- Georgetown Linguist Deborah Tannen
Sponsored by SU
Communication & Rhetorical Studies, iSchool, Department of Linguistics, Women in
Science and Engineering, and Women's and Gender Studies.
Everyone assumes everyone else thinks like them, and that if they don't, there
is something wrong with them.
Men vs. women: Why don't men stop to ask directions? People assume
that "You mean the same as I would mean in that circumstance." So women
stop, make a connection, and haven't lost anything by asking. Men,
on the other hand, lose power by asking, and besides, the other guy won't
know either, but won't admit it, and they will get lost anyway. (None of
the interviewed women worried about being intentionally misdirected.)
Women tend to face one another when they speak, and lean in. Men sit at
angles--which could be perceived as disinterest in what the partner is saying.
However, it isn't the case that men don't care about connections, and that women
are disinterested in power.
Girls vs boys. Girls tell each other secrets to negotiate closeness and
connection; they also cannot tell a secret to someone they don't like.
Hence, cliques. A boy's best friend is the one he does everything
with, the one who will be on his side in a fight. They negotiate who is
good at what, and play fighting is very common. Boys are sensitive to
being put down or pushed around as these affect status. (Don't tell me
what to do). But one-upsmanship can be fun! Girls, on the other
hand, often dislike braggarts.
Moms vs daughters: Can't say anything to daughter, because its perceived
as criticism. Daughters think: she's always criticizing. This
is true, but it's out of care.
Sisters: Sisters are always compared, and there is a hierarchy. Intentions
and abilities are important. Often think issue is with content of what is
said, but it is often how it said (direct, circuitous, ritual)/
Questions:
In selecting a therapist, is gender important? An effective
therapist is aware of the differences and bias due to gender, and allows for it.
How much is nature vs nurture? Combination of both. Can tease
some out by looking at cultural differences. In every culture, boys fight
for fun, whereas girls will fight because they are mad. There are others
who think all nature or nurture. Men are more likely ot argue for
biological, women to say cultural.
What about training salespeople? Tell to make eye contact.
She would bet that successful salespeople. like the therapist, allows for
differences, cross-cultural differences as well (e.g., Korean and American south
will not look at folks with higher status in the eye)
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Evolutionary Aspects of Gender and Sexuality.
Joan Roughgarden, Professor Emerita, Biological Sciences and
Geophysics, Stanford University. Evolutionary
Aspects of Gender and Sexuality. Dr.
Roughgarden challenged Darwin's theory of sexual
selection with a discussion of “social selection" in which gender roles
and sexuality are adaptations which facilitate cooperation in complex
societies. This lecture was a joint presentation of the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions and Adaptive Peaks lecture series and
GSA’s Shifting Paradigms annual lecture.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Negotiation--advice and role-playing exercises
Roseanne Ecker, Director of Career
Services at SU. If you've been offered a job,
should I ask for more salary than they offer? Yes!
Isn't that rude? Well, you should remember that EVERY
raise and bonus that you receive will be calculated as a
percentage of your salary. If you start at less than you
could, the cumulative loss over your career there--adds up
mighty quick. And if there happens to be a freeze on
raises (as happened to one of the audience members), you will be
stuck at that too low rate. What if they can't provide
more? This is always a possibility, but if you don't ask,
you won't ever know. Also consider if there are other
things that can help you do what it is that you are being hired
to do. Training? Equipment? Lab space?
Assistants? Computers and software? If they cannot
provide you with your own, will you have adequate access to
existing lab spaces, vehicles, and help to carry out experiments
or teach the bazillion lab sections you are expected to offer?
It may be that you don't want more money, but for personal
reasons (commuting costs a fortune, the need for eldercare is on
the rise) you need flexibility in your schedule (set own hours,
or the ability to work from home a few days a week...if you
provide a convincing argument why this can help them meet their
goals (rather than just reduce your commuting costs--although
reducing gas usage is a great societal goal, it many not
be in their business plan at this point in time), you are more
likely to be in a position to receive these amenities. And
when it works, they will have gained your expertise and loyalty,
eliminating their need to conduct another search, train a
replacement, and the time costs of bringing said person up to
speed--all costly propositions (especially if they continue to
botch their efforts to set up employees to succeed, and have to
do it all over again).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)