On July 23, 2013, ESF designated Room 313 Baker Hall as a dedicated room for nursing mothers. After some minor adjustments, the room now has a chair, outlet and occupancy sign, and is only lockable from the interior, meeting NYS Department of Labor requirements for such a room--once they bring in a table. Although this room (after a few modifications) will meet requirements for employers to provide a private place to express milk for infants for their first 3 years, Tim Blehar, Department of Human Resources, assures us that any mom, including visitors and full- and part-time students, is welcome to use it for nursing or pumping. No one will check the child's birthdate, and no reservations are necessary--just let yourself in, slide the occupancy sign to 'occupied', lock from the interior, and reverse steps when you are done. Users must provide their own pumps and bring their expressed milk with them in their own cooler or to a food-safe refrigerator.
The administration has pledged to either upgrade the plumbing to a more functional sink and counter and the lock so that it meets ADA requirements, and/or to find an alternate location on campus that has those capacities, and is more centrally located. They also liked the idea of putting up a bulletin board for moms to share information. Please contact the Human Resources office at
470-6611 if you notice that this room requires maintenance, or (UPDATE!): Heather Engelman, 315-470-4752, if you have any questions about using the space.
On a related note, there is a changing table located in the newly completed family restroom in the basement of the Gateway Building.
UPDATE: Administration was unable to locate a better space, so have been repairing walls and readying to replace the floor basin with a counter height sink and cabinet. UPDATE 1/6/14: Renovations seem complete! Counter and sink are functional, there is a second, more easily accessible outlet, a facade now covers the previously exposed pipes. They have even added a mirror, which both adds brightness and helps Moms check that all their buttons are lined up before heading back out (boy, that would have been handy for me!)
As
part of the course requirements for FOR496/797, students share responsibility for
reporting on the WiSE Professions Speaker Series. The following was
prepared by Olga Shevtsova
Jackie Carrera, president and CEO of Parks & People Foundation in
Baltimore, concluded ESF’s 2013 Women in Scientific and Environmental (WiSE)
Professions Series with Revitalizing Baltimore: A better city through environmental discoveryonTuesday, April 23. The seminar was jointly sponsored by the Graduate Student Association and the ESF
Women's Caucus.
Parks & People began with the idea that there is one park, a city
within a park, that is, rather than many parks within a city as the greenspace
and corridors provide a network for a healthy community.Ms Carrera discussed problems in the city of
Baltimore, including significant property abandonment as a result of suburban
sprawl, lack of opportunities for young people, stream erosion and non-point
source pollution, uncoordinated approaches to natural resource management. These
examples demonstrated the urgent necessity of the Urban Resources Initiative
which works towards sustainability through applied ecosystem management
principles. This working group learned that “Urban greening programs influenced
the health of the city—they bring people together in a way they are not used to
working together.This increases their social
capital, enabling them to take on bigger community issues like schools and
crime.They also have an economic
benefit by increasing property values.”
Carrera also focused on the power of partnership
between governments at all levels, nonprofits, academia, businesses, and
communities. Defining the most important steps of planning process through
discussion of how to meet the goals and how they’ve changed is a key to achieve
urban ecological restoration. The Baltimore Ecosystem
Study (BES) has enhanced increased public support of scientific research. Parks
& People Foundation affords opportunities for BES scientists to communicate
their knowledge for practical application in community organizing and public
policy. Initiating different workshops, annual meetings, trainings and science
presentations all contributed to the project’s success.It is imperative that on the ground
management strategies use sound scientific approaches; and that science
research is informed by practical needs. The process “is established, then
fixed, then tweaked, in an iterative way” to assure that everyone at each level
are at the same table.
Watershed 263 is a classic example. "The city had an unfunded mandate to
clean up pollutants flowing into the city.This watershed featured lots of impervious surfaces, a lot of city owned
land, and significant but dispersed open space. What, they wondered, would
happen if they could reduce the asphalt?The removal of back parking lot of Franklin Square Elementary School,
coupled with other projects increased the area available for infiltration."
Good Science is the key, and a technology committee capable of
communicating science with practitioners, is the tipping point.
About Jackie Carrera Jackie Carrera has been instrumental in the development of a 15-mile
urban greenway, community forestry and watershed restoration programs numerous
youth sports and camp programs which continue to be integral to the
revitalization efforts of some of that city’s most underserved communities. She
also chaired Revitalizing Baltimore, a US Forest Service urban and community
forestry project and is a co-principal investigator for the Baltimore EcosystemStudy, a National Science Foundation-funded, long term ecological research
project. Ms. Carrera represented the Chesapeake region in preparing
for the Obama Administration’s America’s Great Outdoors Initiative and the
Urban Waters Initiative. She served on a national task force initiated by
the US Forest Service,Vibrant
Cities and Urban Forests: A National Call for to Action. Ms. Carrera
was voted one of theDaily
Record’s Maryland’s Top 100 Women and 100 Most Influential Marylanders by
The MarylandDaily Recordand was named the 2008 University of
Baltimore Distinguished Social Entrepreneur. Ms. Carrera is a graduate of the
Greater Baltimore Committee Leadership Program and the Weinberg Fellows
Program. She earned a BA, Business Administration degree in Finance from Loyola
College in Maryland.
When we scheduled our campus screening with the Baobab Society, we
tried to place it in March as a Women's History Month/belated
International Women's Day event. But as we prepare for Passover, I
realized that the timing also has relevance for this holiday, at least for me. You see, my mother struggled to find a family Haggadah (the book read during the seder)
that told the ancient tale, but still felt relevant to her. She found
one she liked well enough for our immediate family and the friends that joined us
each year (our extended family is very widely scattered), largely
because it used everyday English, but also because the language was a
little less gendered than the version used at her childhood table. But it still didn't quite let the gathered envision themselves in the story--which is a goal of each telling. So, I now have Mom's collection, plus a variety of other haggadot that each have something that I like, but none I'd recommend in its entirety.
I
am now one of the friends at another family's table. They
worked around their similar dissatisfaction with commercially available Haggadot by writing their own. They used the biblical story as its basis, but contemporizes its telling by interspersing a few jokes (Why do we call it matzah? Well, it has little holes like matzah.), and stories of current day social justice issues--subjugation of others by
virtue of ethnicity, class, gender, sexual orientation, even dietary
preferences (they have vegan, vegetarian, and carnivorous options at
their table--all kosher l'Pesach). This reminds the
gathered that despite the dissolution of slavery in Exodus, and even later in
the US, human trafficking still flourishes in parts of the country. In
many countries, girls marry far too young as her virtue and fertility
are bartered for her family's financial security. Rape might be perceived as a rite of passage or punishment for being in a man's world. And those that speak out against these or other practices have been subject to punishment.
Tonight, we will sing the
traditional verses of Dayenu ("It would have been enough") which gives
thanks for each level of assistance provided from slavery to the
promised land, each of which "would have been enough" and will read new verses that bring us from that moment into our
time. We will belt out songs from the '60s peace movement, Debbie
Freidman's Miriam's Song, and Tracy Chapman's Why, accompanied by
tambourines and other instruments that decorate the table, enjoying food
that celebrates both Ashkenazim and Mizrahi traditions. And when we
do, I'll think of Wadley, Senna, Yasmin and the others--and the choices that they don't yet have. And I will once again thank this family for making history live for my child (and for my husband and I), and reenforcing the aspects of his heritage that address inclusion, righting wrongs, and building community.
If you missed the ESF screening, please book seats at
http://gathr.us/screening/2445 for Wed. April 10, 7:30 pm, Regal 17 Cinemas at
Destiny. Tickets ($10 ea) must be reserved -- cards are not charged until a
sufficient number of tickets are reserved, and if they don't reach that
goal within the allotted time, showings are cancelled. As of this moment, they still need about 20 reservations. This has been the
fate of other regional showings--I hope this means
that our local community is just not yet not familiar with this ticketing
mechanism rather than disinterest in the subject.
The SU Chapter of She's the First, a not-for-profit that "sponsors
girls’ education in the developing world, helping them be the first in
their families to graduate" will host SU's campus screening on Wed
April 3 at 7:30 pm in NewHouse 3 Rm 141. Other events
scheduled for "She's the First{Syracuse} Week" include:
Mo Apr 1 Insomnia Cookie Fundraising --10% of all proceeds will go to STF
Bake Sale 10-4, Schine
Yoga Night, 7:30 pm, Archibold Gym, 1st Fl
Tu Apr 2 Conversation with Christen Brandt, STF's Director of International Operations and SU Newhouse alumna, The Herg, NH3
We Apr 3 Bake Sale, 10-4, Schine Center and Girl Rising, 7:30 pm in NewHouse 3 Rm 141
Th Apr 4 Girls+Education= Magho (Daughter)
http://shesthefirst.org/magho/ & forum on girls' education, 7 pm, HL 107.
Fr Apr 5 Bake Sale 10-4 Schine, Late Night Ice Skating, 9pm-12am, Tennity
Sa Apr 6, Dodgeball for Education, 1:30 pm, Women's Bldg Gym A, $1 spectator fee
PIH is also trying to schedule a showing at Shoppingtown on May 9, 7:30 pm. These seats are reservable at
http://gathr.us/screening/2124
About Girl Rising: This feature film shares the stories of 9 individual
girls--"transformed for the screen by an acclaimed writer from
her native country: Marie Arana from Peru, Edwidge Danticat from
Haiti, Mona Eltahawy from Egypt, Aminatta Forna from Sierra
Leone, Zarghuna Kargar from Afghanistan, Maaza Mengiste from
Ethiopia, Sooni Taraporevala from India, Manjushree Thapa from
Nepal, and Loung Ung from Cambodia. Priyanka Chopra, Selena
Gomez, Anne Hathaway, Alicia Keys, Meryl Streep, Kerry
Washington and other celebrated actresses contribute voice
performances to the film, which features original music from
Academy Award winner Rachel Portman, in collaboration with Hans
Zimmer."
The
film is rated PG-13 because it deals with some of the elements of the serious
issues that the girls have faced in their lives (e.g., sexual violence, AIDS,
and homelessness). However, nothing graphic or explicit is shown (no nudity,
swearing, or violence). Parents should take into account the maturity of their children as some
subject matter may just go over their heads. A
rough cut of the film was assessed as appropriate for 6th grade and up.
As part of the course requirements
for FOR496, students share responsibility for reporting on the WiSE Professions
Speaker Series. The following was prepared by Rose Petersky.
In 1986, Dr. Patricia Wright was looking for the Greater
Bamboo Lemur, a species that had been thought to be extinct, in Madagascar, the
only area of the world where lemurs are naturally found. Weary? from her extended
travel, she decided to stop at a local hotel. Behind the hotel was a forest.Within that forest, Dr. Wright not only found
the lemur that she sought, but also a new species-- the Golden Bamboo
Lemur.Despite the ecological significance of these finds,
she knew that the forest would not be around for much longer without
protection. She visited the Madagascar Department of Water and Forests to try
to persuade them to make the forest a preserve. Their response was that they
would be happy to comply, if they were given the necessary funding. Wright recalled
to the audience of about 80 in ESF’s Illick Hall that she “walked out of that
office thinking, ‘oh dear’ and then [she] became a conservationist.” Seven
years later, Ramonafana National Park was founded. It was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site
in 2007.
Golden Bamboo Lemur
Lemurs are the most threatened mammal in the world.
Ninety-one percent of lemur species are on the RED list of endangered and
threatened species. They are threatened by deforestation, slash and burn
agriculture, erosion, and mining. Since humans arrived in Madagascar 1,500 years ago, 90 percent of Madagascar’s
forests have been destroyed. Thanks to Dr. Wright, there are 41,600 hectares of
tropical forest where 12 species of lemur are protected. In addition to
providing this essential habitat, Ramonafana National Park also supports 100
scientific researchers annually and employs 85 full-time staff.
Dr. Wright states with confidence that Ramonafana would not
be possible without the support of the local people that cooperated with her
from the very beginning. One half of the admission fees from the park go to local
villages for municipal projects. Ramonafana
also participates in outreach programs around Madagascar such as hosting a
radio station in the park’s recording studio, and an education program that reaches
32 schools and more than 11,000 Malagasy children. In addition,, Ramonafana’s heath team has constructed
230 latrines and installed 30 water pumps in the local area, and provides
disaster relief for 3,000 people.
About Dr. Wright
Considered
to be one of the world’s foremost expert on lemurs, Patricia Wright is best
known for her 26-year study of social and family interactions of wild lemurs in
Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar, and for leading the effort to establish
this park.For this work, she holds,
among other honors, the prestigious National Medal of Honor of
Madagascar. She is the founder of the Institute for the Conservation of
Tropical Environments (ICTE) and Centre ValBio (CVB), and a Professor in the
Department of Anthropology, all at Stony Brook University. Wright has
worked extensively on conservation. In the late 1980s she spearheaded an
integrated conservation and development project that, in 1991, led to the
establishment of Ranomafana
National Park. Wright has received many honors for her
conservation work in Madagascar, including the prestigious "Chevalier d’
Ordre National” National Medal of Honor of Madagascar, from the President of
Madagascar in 1995.
About
the series
Dr. Wright’s lecture “Lemur
Conservation in Madacasgar: Updates from Ranomafana National Park“on February
21, 2013 was a joint presentation of the Women in Scientific and Environmental
(WiSE) Professions and the Adaptive Peaks Speaker Series.It was sponsored by the Department of Environmental and
Forest Biology, ESF Women's Caucus and the Graduate Student Association. For
more information about the WiSE Professions Series, please visit http://www.esf.edu/womenscaucus .
"Free to Be...You and Me" just turned 40! I loved the songs and stories as a child, and I was thrilled to hear Darius Rucker cover football hero Rosey Grier's "Its all right to cry" on a For the Kids CD. I remember the messages delivered by older kids as they performed the skits during an assembly in the gymatorium. But I struggled to recall a melody for my then preschool son--who, like William, has a doll. Unlike little William, who was mocked for his choice, our community supported my child's decision to bring his baby into restaurants and to religious services. Many applauded his effort to not only care for her, but to include her in activities. Until he stood up to join the other children in dance and adjusted Karen on his hip, many had not realized that the small, fair-trade scarf was not a blanket, but was converted into a sling, very similar to the one I'd used to carry him and that I still use with his cousin. Furthermore, no one questioned why such a fair skinned child had such a dark skinned baby. In the moment that one father offered my child a high five for his future parenting promise, I was overcome with pride and with hope, that when he is a Dad, he has the choice to care for his children as he and his future partner (as all spouses will, indeed, be equal partners) deem best for their family, and they are not hamstrung by societal gender or racial stereotypes. And that worldwide, there will be no need for programs like Girl Rising to bring attention to the necessity of bringing girls into education to break their cycle of poverty.
I hope some of those stereotypes really are relegated to history, where they should remain as lessons. My son's current teacher, in preparation for Martin Luther King Day, shared that "It really is gratifying to have to explain the laws he worked to change--our [kids] have absolutely no idea why anyone would ever judge a person by the color of their skin (or hair, or eyes..)." What a wonderful birthday present for Dr. King!
In related (to gender stereotypes) news, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will announce today and notify Congress that the U.S. military is ending its policy of excluding women from combat with the goal of opening up as many jobs as possible to female troops. Branches will be examining physical
standards and gender-neutral accommodations within combat units over the next few years, and will report their progress quarterly. From an equity standpoint, its about damn time. However, I'm wary that "If, after the assessment, a branch finds that a specific job or unit
should not be open, they can go back to the secretary and ask for an
exemption to the policy, to designate the job or unit as closed." This concerns me, somewhat because of its CYA, and don't worry your pretty little head implications, but primarily because if there really are positions that are so dangerous or difficult that not one woman is capable of even attempting to compete to fill it, than how screwed up is our world that there is a need for such a position, for anyone, for any length of time?!
Earlier this week, I stumbled upon two opinions regarding gender equity and the workplace.
President Obama, in a joint interview with Michelle Obama, told LHJ that he suspected that more women don't run for office because they are either uncomfortable with the idea, or lack the option to, be away from their children that long. (I argue that these are not mutually exclusive. An unsupportive spouse, or the rigid and overtime-exempt work schedule of an otherwise empathetic spouse, could easily be a source of that discomfort). Being the child of a single mom, 'taught [him] that there wasn't anything women couldn't do--but also that the game was a little rigged. Its tougher for women.'
The following day, a linkedin article popped into my mailbox: "In Big Idea 2013: Flexibility without Shame", Sallie Krawcheck discussed the problem as it pertained to women in general, and to moms. She never stated that the solution would be, or should be, limited to only moms. It's too bad that she didn't explicity say that policies should be open, however, because getting buy-in from others that could benefit at work (and on the homefront) is important to encourage businesses (and spouses) to offer (or ask for) such polices and build employee loyalty by encouraging work-life-community balance for every employee.
If only mommies can shift their schedules to drop off packages at the post office or to get kiddos or grandpa to a doctor's appointment, then there is no impetutus for the other parent (or sibling) to help lessen those burdens (and build those relationships). Many workers (dads, and the childless, too) might like to restructure their workweek, to shorten their commutes by timing them during less busy periods or to bundle conference calls and number crunching so they can be done at home and simply reduce the number of trips to the office. Both methods can save precious time, reduce wear and tear on aging vehicles and roadways, and reduce CO2 emissions--all laudable goals in their own rights. If those vehicles happen to be employer owned, or subject to billable mileage, its even more business friendly. If that intelligent use of business time also allows someone to toss in a load of laundry or start dinner for their families, well, then, the playing field gets leveled a little, and whole families can enjoy that.
83% of women scientists and 54% of men scientists are partnered with
other scientists link.
Those figures didn't look at
other academic or professional partners, so a huge number of current
and potential faculty are up against the "two-body problem."
SU Wise invited SU and ESF doctoral students (women AND men), and
other students and faculty who are now, or may be in relationship where
both will have professional careers, to join their panelists for
a conversation about:
-Can we both be equally successful?
-Who moves for whose career?
-Living apart?
- How/when do you ask about institutional dual career hiring practices?
-What do you negotiate for once position is offered? What are effective strategies?
The two most novel parts of this discussion: that so many men attended! And that SU now has a Dual Career counselor (via SU ADVANCE) that meets confidentially with every interviewee, at the time of their on campus interview, to discuss what options might be available for a partner. By bypassing the search committee in this discussion, they have a chance to look at other openings that might be a good match for the partner, so that when an offer is made, this office can provide better advice. This service came to be after the realization that they were losing great candidates because they were unable to even make suggestions before the candidate found a workable solution somewhere else.
All three couples agreed that SU's developing model would have been better than the situations they encountered. They wondered: where in the process do we mention the partner? For one, early disclosure seemed the right way to go, for another, they noted that they'd received 4 workable offers, but only one from an institution where they had disclosed (there happened to be advertised positions in each of their fields, so they had each been fully vetted along with all the other applicants). The panelists also discussed the value of applying lots of places, so that when an offer was received, they could say "my partner is also on the market, and received offers at x,y,z." This was especially important if the department partner hoped to join hadn't been searching, so had no means to compare partner to other candidates. Knowing that partner fared well when other institutions had made that comparison helped their cases. There was also the impression that private institutions were "more nimble" in their ability to arrange a dual hire.
All three of these couples had made the decision not to live apart if it was at all possible, so dual residences and what to do if there are already children in the mix may be addressed at future panels.
I just found the gift that I wish I could send back in time to my tween self. Although lego bricks are inherently gender neutral toys (prior to the special sets with space and dinosaur warriors that my son now covets), in the 70s, they remained solidly in the "boy" aisle of the toy store. Maybe boys used them to embrace their inner weapon designer? Anyway, although she is nearly a generation younger, the creative force behind GoldieBlox suffered the same absence of spatial acuity toys. She never considered engineering as a field for herself until a high school calculus teacher suggested it to her--I'm glad she had that teacher, rather than Mr. "girls don't do math" at my school! She has now applied her engineering and product design background to observe how girls play, and develop a 'toy' that combines the reading that girls love with a spatial design toolbox that allows them to explore and build solutions along with the heroine. Reminds me of those choose-your-own-adventure books that I adored, but with a really great twist.
Debbie Sterling built only one set. She showcased it in a promotional video to gain support on Kickstarter. Support has been so strong that she had the startup capital she needed in only two weeks. Goldiblox are now in their "production run" and are taking pre-orders with an anticipated delivery date of this spring.
Lily O'Donnell of policymic suggests that this toy might help close the gender pay gap, by bringing more women into such a male dominated and high paying field. Maybe--for the women that head into this field, who also have supportive husbands and partners on their homefronts. I'm really excited by the prospect that this toy can help many girls see engineering as way they can
solve the problems that are important to them, and to make things better
for other girls around the world. What could a fleet of feminine embracing engineers bring to the table? Maybe instead of bigger and stronger weapons, and bigger and stronger humvees, they'll find a way to stretch resources whose shortages led to political tension in the first place.
Is this the right place to ponder that maybe if Lego had included pastel bricks with their primary cousins in the first place (rather than making separate and inferior pink and lavender sets so many years after the fact), that the parents of girls might have been receptive to them all along? Was the risk really too great that boys wouldn't have been able to see past the pastels? Maybe, now that preschool boys are secure enough in their masculinity to assemble pink bunny machine guns (I witnessed this firsthand in my child's daycare), that worry is moot.
David Frum, CNN recently pondered the idea that you don't reduce the number of women seeking abortions by banning them, but rather making them accessible BUT improving economic conditions for unexpected moms so that they can consider that maybe they can provide a good life for their little surprises. His discussion begins with the financial toll of carrying to term (and to college graduation) children conceived in rape. He describes the correlation between better care and economic conditions in other nations with their low abortion rates. Its a well argued position, and at the time I initially viewed the piece, the respondents were surprisingly well mannered in their contributions as well.
He could have continued: Better economic conditions could also lead to better pre- and post -natal care for both planned and serendipitous children. Such care should be associated with reduced need for sick days, so isn't a system that encourages either or both more business friendly? Family planning and childcare are societal concerns, not just women's issues. And policies that support work-life balance should support all workers, not just parents, and certainly not just Moms. Requiring salaried workers to burn both ends of their candles in perpetuity can't really be good for the bottom line. Everyone should be able to help Dad get to the doctor, pick up groceries for a recuperating neighbor, weed the community garden, contribute time to the local firehouse or ambulance crew, or just enjoy a few minutes of rare sunny Syracuse weather. Better mental health supports better physical health--again fewer sick days. And perhaps higher worker satisfaction and energy levels--so when you do have a legitimate emergency, they do have some reserves to draw upon. Higher employee satisfaction leads to less turnover, lower training costs, no lost productivity while you try to fill a position and bring up to speed.
I don't follow football. At all. Nope, not even a teensy, little bit. But even I can easily tell that this Facebook poster (ca Oct 2012)
counting down the hrs till the game 4 the Cowgirls and the G-Men
prefers that the NY Giants win over the Dallas Cowboys in their fourth match-up this season. I figured it out even prior to reading:
GO GIANTS!
My response
Really? must you insult girls this way?
was not intended (as might be interpreted, with a hearty guffaw) to say that Dallas really is awful, a bunch of pansies or sissies (Remember, I don't follow football, so cannot assess anything about their teamwork or prospects.) I was questioning why being a girl (or a sissy, which many children may endearingly call older siblings, before they can fully articulate her name or the word 'sister') is an insult. Research has shown that girls do well, even better than their male classmates, in math and science--until they realize that girls aren't 'supposed to be good at math and science.' Girls have taken the opportunities granted by Title IX to show they can be smart, funny, strong, creative, athletic. Separately, boys can be sweet, nurturing, kind, articulate. And every child can whine or cry -- regardless of gender (or sexual orientation).
In my college field experience (ca 1990) the biggest insults were: take the skirt off. got your panties in a bunch? Accusations of PMS. These were all uttered by hulking behemoths at other men, by the way, not to the handful of women that generally slogged on with 'our big girl panties' beneath our jeans and flannel. I ascertained, therefore, that then, just as now, that the emasculating slights implied that being a girl is demeaning, less than, inferior. Some might say: you are taking this out of context. Its not offensive to call a girl a girl, just to do so to a manly man. You are taking it too personally. Pardon me--you said that its not ok to be a girl. Man up, buddy--how can that possibly not be personal?