In
addition to the points in the press release (below), this resonated with me: Sexual
harassment has adverse effects that not only affect the targets of harassment
but also bystanders, coworkers, workgroups, and entire organizations (i.e., bad for business), and
the damage harassment does to scientific integrity. This, included in the release, also struck home:
“When women
are sexually harassed, their least common response is to formally report the
experience. Many women do not report because they
perceive -- accurately, the report notes -- that they may experience
retaliation or other negative outcomes if they do so.”
A recording of the Press Conference is still forthcoming, but a 4 p. recommendation document is available as are a 2 min recommendation video, a few infographics, and the full (>300 pages) pre-publication of the report, all downloadable from: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/shstudy/index.htm
Also, please note that a draft
schedule for 6/26 (which we’ll livestream in
314 Bray Hall!) is available. And now, the text of NASEM’s press release:
To Prevent Sexual Harassment, Academic Institutions Should Go Beyond
Legal Compliance to Promote a Change in Culture; Current Approaches Have Not
Led to Decline in Harassment WASHINGTON -- A systemwide change to the culture and climate in higher education is needed to prevent and effectively respond to sexual harassment, says a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. There is no evidence that current policies, procedures, and approaches – which often focus on symbolic compliance with the law and on avoiding liability -- have resulted in a significant reduction in sexual harassment.
The report, which examines sexual harassment of women in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine, concludes that the cumulative result of sexual harassment is significant damage to research integrity and a costly loss of talent in these academic fields. The report urges institutions to consider sexual harassment equally important as research misconduct in terms of its effect on the integrity of research.
Colleges and universities and federal agencies should move beyond basic legal compliance to adopt holistic, evidence-based policies and practices to address sexual harassment, the report says. It notes that sexual harassment often occurs in an environment of generalized incivility and disrespect. In contrast, sexual harassment is less likely to occur when organizational systems and structures support diversity, inclusion, and respect.
“A change to the culture and climate in our nation’s colleges and universities can stop the pattern of harassing behavior from impacting the next generation of women entering science, engineering, and medicine,” said Paula Johnson, co-chair of the committee that conducted the study and wrote the report, and president of Wellesley College.
In addition, the report urges Congress and state legislatures to consider a range of actions, including prohibiting confidentiality in settlement agreements and allowing lawsuits to be filed directly against alleged harassers, not just their institutions. It recommends that judges, academic institutions, and administrative agencies rely on scientific evidence about the behavior of targets and perpetrators of sexual harassment when assessing both institutional compliance with the law and the merits of individual claims. And it urges professional societies to use their influence to address sexual harassment in the scientific, medical, and engineering communities they represent, and to help promote professional cultures of civility and respect.
Among the report’s findings:
- Sexual
harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine. In a survey the
University of Texas System conducted among its graduate and undergraduate
students, about 20 percent of female science students, more than a quarter
of female engineering students, and more than 40 percent of female medical
students experienced sexual harassment from faculty or staff. The
Pennsylvania State University System conducted a similar survey and found
that 33 percent of its female undergraduates and 43 percent of its female
graduate students (all disciplines) experienced sexual harassment from
faculty or staff; so did 50 percent of female medical students. As
these surveys reveal, women students in academic medicine experience more
frequent sexual harassment perpetrated by faculty and staff than women
students in science and engineering.
- Organizational
climate is the single most important factor in determining whether sexual
harassment is likely to happen in a work setting. The degree to which an
organization’s climate is seen by those within it as permissive of sexual
harassment has the strongest relationship with how much sexual harassment
occurs in that organization. There is often a perceived tolerance for
sexual harassment in academia, the report says.
- Gender
harassment is by far the most common form of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment can
take three forms: gender harassment (verbal and nonverbal behaviors that
convey hostility, objectification, exclusion, or second-class status about
members of one gender); unwanted sexual attention (unwelcome verbal or
physical sexual advances, which can include assault); and sexual coercion
(when favorable professional or educational treatment is conditioned on
sexual activity).
- When
women are sexually harassed, their least common response is to formally
report the experience. Many women do not report because they perceive --
accurately, the report notes -- that they may experience retaliation or
other negative outcomes if they do so. Instead, women cope with sexual
harassment most often by ignoring or appeasing the harasser and seeking
social support.
- Sexual
harassment undermines women’s professional and educational attainment and
mental and physical health. When women experience sexual harassment in the
workplace, the professional outcomes include declines in job satisfaction,
performance, or productivity; increases in job stress; and withdrawal from
the organization. When students experience sexual harassment, the
educational outcomes include greater truancy, dropping classes, receiving
lower grades, or dropping out. These conclusions are based in part on a
study commissioned by the committee that interviewed women who had
experienced at least one sexually harassing behavior in the last five
years.
- Sexual
harassment training has not been demonstrated to change behavior. While sexual harassment
training can be useful in improving knowledge of policies and of behaviors
that constitute sexual harassment, it has not been demonstrated to prevent
sexual harassment or change people’s behaviors or beliefs.
Preventing and effectively addressing sexual harassment of women in academia is a significant challenge, but research shows what will work to prevent sexual harassment, says the report. College and university presidents, provosts, deans, and department chairs should make the reduction and prevention of sexual harassment an explicit goal of their tenure. “Ultimately, success in addressing this challenge will require strong and effective leadership from administrators at every level within academia, as well as support and work from all members of our nation’s college campuses – students, faculty, and staff,” said committee co-chair Sheila Widnall, Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The report offers evidence-based recommendations as a road map for academic institutions:
- Address
gender harassment. Leaders in academia and at research and training sites
should pay increased attention to and enact policies that cover gender
harassment, as a way to address the most common form of sexual harassment
and to help prevent other types of harassment.
- Improve
transparency and accountability. Systems in which prohibitions against unacceptable
behaviors are clear and that hold members of the community accountable for
meeting behavioral and cultural expectations established by leadership
have lower rates of sexual harassment. Academic institutions should
develop and share clear policies on sexual harassment and standards of
behavior. These policies should include a range of clearly stated,
escalating disciplinary consequences for perpetrators found to have
violated the policy, and the disciplinary actions taken should correspond
to the severity and frequency of the harassment. Decisions regarding
disciplinary actions should be made in a fair and timely way, following an
investigative process that is fair to all sides.
- Create
diverse, inclusive, and respectful environments. Academic institutions
should work to create a diverse, inclusive, and respectful environment where
these values are aligned with and integrated into the structures,
policies, and procedures of the institution. They should take explicit
steps to achieve greater gender and racial equity in hiring and
promotions, and thus improve the representation of women at every level.
They should combine anti-harassment efforts with civility promotion
programs. Focusing evaluation and reward structures on cooperation and
collegiality rather than solely on individual-level teaching and research
could have a significant impact on improving the environment in academia.
- Diffuse
the hierarchical and dependent relationship between faculty and trainees. To reduce the risk of
sexual harassment, academic institutions should consider mechanisms such
as mentoring networks or committee-based advising, and departmental
funding rather than funding only from a principal investigator.
- Provide
support for targets of sexual harassment. Academic institutions
should convey that reporting sexual harassment is an honorable and
courageous action. They also should provide alternative, less formal ways
of recording information about the experience and reporting it when a
target is not comfortable filing a formal report. Regardless of whether a
formal report is filed, institutions should provide targets of harassment
with ways to access support services such as health care and legal
services, and develop approaches for preventing targets of harassment from
experiencing retaliation.
Contacts:
Sara Frueh, Media Relations Officer
Andrew Robinson, Media Relations Assistant
Office of News and Public Information
202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu
Social Media:
Follow us on Twitter: @theNASEM
Follow us on Instagram: @theNASEM
Follow us on Facebook: @NationalAcademies
Copies of Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are available at www.nap.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment