Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Breaking down the Title IX process with Toyia Sims, ESF Title IX Coordinator

By Ava Dunham, Environmental Biology, B.S. ‘27

During the final session of FOR 496 Perspectives on Career and Gender, Toyia Sims delved into what her job as ESFs Title IX coordinator involves and how the reporting process works.

Title IX is a federal law that states: "No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal aid." (Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972). This includes sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexual violence. Every student has the right to report behavior that violates Title IX.

The first step in reporting is reaching out to Toyia Sims and/or University Police, Syracuse Police, or New York state Police. Sims can be reached at her office at 216 Bray Hall, 315-470-6617, or email TitleIX@esf.edu.  Individuals may also use the campus Bias Reporting System, https://www.esf.edu/ide/bias.php.  

What might this conversation look like? What happens next?

“The complainant… drives the car” Sims explained. The nature of Title IX violations means there are multiple approaches to how reporting works. A written intake form is typically the first step and includes a description of the incident with details like dates and time. These reports can be done anonymously and can also exclude the respondent’s name. Students have the option to file a formal complaint which requires both the complainant and respondent’s name. This opens an investigation. Investigations include an interview with the respondent and potentially a hearing in front of a panel and sanctions. Level of involvement for this process is entirely up to the complainant. A no contact order or NCO can be issued, which is a mutual document between two students for no contact online or in person.

Throughout this process supportive resources are available. “When I meet with the complainant, I always give them options to talk with our counseling center.” Sims said, and “there's outside resources as far as Vera House for anyone who has been a victim of domestic violence… along with our counseling center, along with timely care [that’s] our virtual counselor available for our students.”

Reaching out is the first step. Everyone has a right to feel safe on campus and Sims and other members of ESF Title IX staff are here to support you.

About the speaker: Toyia Sims is the Lead for Civil Service/Classified staff recruitment and appointments, Lead for Graduate Assistants medical insurance, Lead for Student Assistant appointments, assists employee relations for Civil Service/Classified staff units, and currently serving as Title IX Coordinator.

Further resources:

  • ESF counseling center,   110A Bray Hall, 315-470-4716, counseling@esf.edu
  • Vera House, 723 James St, Syracuse, NY 13203, (315) 425-0818
  • University Police Department, 315-470-6666/6667
  • Seth Thompson (he/him/his), Chief Diversity Officer/ Deputy Title IX Coordinator & Affirmative Action Officer, 219 Bray Hall, 315-470-6810, sthomp43@esf.edu
  • Anthony Chefalo (he/him/his), Title IX Investigator, 110 Bray Hal l(315) 470-6660, apchefal@esf.edu
  • Robert Dugan, Chief of University Police, 218 Bray Hall, (315) 470-6667, upolice@esf.edu (email is monitore business hours only; the phone number rings through to someone 24/7)

 

 

Thursday, April 16, 2026

From Gatekeeping to Belonging: Rethinking STEM Education

Headshot of a smiling woman
Dr. Dawn Johnson, SU

Syracuse, NY
In the closing lecture of the 2026 Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions Speaker Series, Dr. Dawn Johnson, Professor, School of Education, Syracuse University explored Identity and Belonging in STEM, particularly for women of color in STEM disciplines. Through her talk, Dr. Johson described how sense of belonging shapes the academic experiences, persistence, and success of women of color in STEM fields, drawing on decades of research, national data, and lived experiences from students.

Johnson began by situating the work within her own path into higher education, noting that she was “the first one in my family to graduate college” and that her professional experiences have taken place primarily at predominantly white schools, colleges, and universities.  Her early work at Worcester Polytechnic Institute sparked a sustained focus on women of color after exploring the possibility of creating a Black sorority on campus, and realizing that only 13 Black and Latina women were enrolled on a campus of approximately 3,000 students—“a number that you know, but then when you hear it, it’s still jarring.”

Central to the talk was the concept of sense of belonging, defined as students’ perceptions of social support, connectedness, and mattering. “Essentially,” said Dr. Johnson, “we want to feel like we matter to somebody, that if we didn’t show up one day, someone would miss us and ask, ‘Where are you? Are you okay? How can I help?’”

While “belonging” has recently gained prominence as a term, the speaker emphasized that it has long been embedded in higher education research, particularly in scholarship focused on racial climate. “Even though belonging is sort of the new word for equity,” she explained, “belonging in many respects has always been connected to equity.”

Further, “belonging is relational and mutual. It’s important to the individual. The individual feels connected to the group, and the group values the individual.”

Participants were invited to reflect on spaces where they experience belonging. Students and employees identified elective courses, laboratory environments, committee work, informal coffee spaces, and affinity groups as places of connection. One student shared that elective courses foster belonging because of “a vast variety of students from different backgrounds,” while a staff member described feeling supported by colleagues who showed up for a committee-led campus event: “I felt really held by the people who showed up because they knew it was important to me.”

The talk then turned to why women of color remain a critical focus in STEM. Despite making up a growing share of college students, women of color continue to be severely underrepresented in STEM degrees. The presenter highlighted how early STEM coursework often functions as a gatekeeping mechanism, citing familiar messages such as, “Look to your left, look to your right. One of you won’t make it.”

Belonging, she explained, is closely tied to STEM identity—“being seen, recognized, and valued as a person who does science”—and is shaped by classroom dynamics, peer interactions, and faculty engagement. Negative experiences, such as being ignored in class or having one’s work dismissed in group projects, undermine that identity, while positive recognition and encouragement help students persist.

Drawing on research from the Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP), Johnson shared findings from the multi-institutional study that included 233 women and 282 men from five central NY institutions. Women of color were more likely to report feeling ignored in class, experiencing racialized dynamics, and feeling less comfortable seeking help from instructors. They also reported lower confidence and higher levels of stress. At the same time, they placed greater value on minority STEM organizations and on “using their STEM degree to give back to their community.”

The talk underscored that these challenges reflect both individual experiences and systemic conditions. “Students are not the problem,” stressed Johnson. “If we could fix it by focusing on the students alone… we wouldn’t still be talking about underrepresented groups in science all these years later.”

Johnson identified Faculty as key change agents in shaping classroom climates, particularly through intentional group work design, mentoring, and early research opportunities. She concluded by emphasizing that fostering belonging is an institutional responsibility and invited attendees to continue the conversation.

Dr. Johnson is a Professor in the School of Education at Syracuse University. Her research focuses on the experiences of students of color in STEM majors at predominantly White institutions, with a special interest in women of color. She teaches courses on college student identity development and was a founding faculty member of the WiSE Women of Color in STEM program at SU. She was previously a Co-Principal Investigator for the Upstate Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (ULSAMP); Syracuse University served as lead institution for the institutions participating in the alliance.  Dr. Johnson earned her Ph.D. in Counseling and Personnel Services from the University of Maryland. 

This presentation was cohosted by the ESF Women’s Caucus; MOSA Intersectional Collective;  Office of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access; and the ESF Science Corps.

 

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

ESF Academics Open Up About Balancing Career and Family

 

Faculty, researchers, and graduate students share candid stories about childcare costs, dual-career challenges, and the strategies that help

Conversations about academic careers usually highlight publications, grants, and professional milestones. At a recent panel hosted by the ESF Women’s Caucus and Graduate Student Association, the focus shifted to the personal realities omitted from CVs: caregiving responsibilities and structural gaps in balancing work and family life.

Moderated by undergraduate student Bella Francisco (Biotechnology ’26), the conversation moved through childcare availability and cost, neurodiversity and disability-related needs, dual-career households, care of older family members, geographic distance from family, and pressures tied to soft-money positions and tenure timelines. Panelists PhD candidate Chloe Beaupre, Research Scientist Dr. Mark Eisenbies, Professor Emeritus Dr. Tom Horton, Associate Professor Dr. Brian Leydet, and Assistant Professor Dr. Danielle Kloster revealed less a checklist of “tips” than a portrait of how academic work bends around family life, and how often families are left to solve systemic problems on their own.

Childcare quickly emerged as a theme: finding, affording, and holding on

 “It is extremely difficult to find childcare in the Syracuse area—and everywhere” summarized Dr. Kloster.   Spaces for healthy children, with no or accessible intervention needs are limited community-wide, let alone those for kiddos with more complex health concerns.  Spots for infants are particularly scarce; preschool seats are more available, but the hours don’t always match student and faculty parents class, lab, and studio schedules.  And there is a hefty price-tag.

Chloe Beaupre: “We’ve been on a waitlist for childcare subsidies… We’re just bleeding money. And that’s a huge barrier.”

Dr. Leydet: “I don’t make enough to pay for daycare… my wife decided to stay home because it was the fiscally right thing to do—and it was completely incorrect for her career.” 

Unpredictability of foster placements compounds the already difficult task of securing childcare on short notice. Kloster: “With foster care, … you usually get a few hours’ notice, so it’s scrambling to try to find an open spot. I’ve called 20-plus daycares trying to get them a spot.…We’ve been pretty lucky that we [now] have really good, consistent daycare. But when the kids are sick, it does become a big mental load to figure out who it’s most appropriate to stay home in any given scenario.”

Care that is reliable and close to campus makes a world of difference. The short distance to Beaupre’s provider allowed her to nurse during a period when her infant wouldn’t take a bottle.  Now over that hurdle, she can focus on work knowing her child is in good hands.

For Horton, early childcare required logistics and improvisation. He described the careful teaching schedules he and Dr. Annette Krezner coordinated to pass their oldest child back and forth. He recalled learning years later that drop-off was harder and more stigmatized for Krezner than he realized at the time: their daughter cried far more when Krezner left.

Dual-Career Households and Geographic Isolation

Dr. Eisenbies reflected on how hard it can be to place two PhDs in the same region. He recalled accepting a prior position partly because there was also a role for his statistician wife—an offer that ultimately fell through, leading to the realization that: “If there’s not a job here for my wife, there’s not a job here for me.”

Leydet, who has no nearby family, described the toll of geographic isolation. He and his wife had their first date in two and a half years only recently, when his mother visited.  “I really wish I would have been closer to family. I think that would have been a lifesaver.”

Distance can also complicate care of older family members that require sudden, and sometimes ongoing care. Several panelists chose ESF to be closer to aging parents or injured in-laws after extended periods of frequent long drives to provide assistance.

Timing isn’t everything

Panelists pushed back on the trope that there is a single “right” time to have children. Carefully made plans can be upended by difficulty conceiving or carrying, an early arrival, or unexpected temporary or long-term care needs of those children, parents, or partners.

Kloster shared the mindset that has helped her stay grounded while raising young children and building toward tenure.  “I don’t want to waste my kid’s childhood working all the time, and I don’t want to waste my job stressing about it all the time. I want to enjoy it while I’m doing it.”

Beaupre pointed to what she sees as a toxic culture in academia around family, criticizing the practice of dedicating dissertations to children with apologies for missed bedtimes.  “This culture of treating academia like it’s just all that matters, and it should be all consuming, is so toxic. It’s a job. We have lives outside of it, and we do our jobs better when we can have that balance.”

Leydet cautioned against comparing productivity with colleagues, noting that he has witnessed this practice—even in formal tenure processes—and that it does particular harm to parents.  “Not comparing myself to others is really, really important, because everybody’s situation is different. No one is in your situation—don’t compare yourself to anybody else. Do what feels right, and keep moving forward.”

External support can be another lifeline. Horton described an NSF grant Kretzer secured that was structured to help trailing spouses find employment, calling it a model worth revisiting.  “You can apply for money—if you work it and shop around, find out who’s doing that kind of thing—and then use that as a leverage point with universities.”

Kretzer’s old friend was a critical source of support for Horton and Kretzer as her health declined.  Kristin visited weekly, and actively aided in increasingly physically and emotionally demanding care.

Beaupre credited new friends, in the form of on-campus groups (ESF Women’s Caucus and FamilyResources), for connecting her to daycare, and ongoing conversations.

What Works: Mentorship, Clear Expectations, and Communication

Kloster credited clear promotion and tenure expectations as a key source of stability.  “I know exactly how many papers I need to publish, how much grant money I need…  And that helps me to shut off at the end of the day.”

She also shared advice that resonated with her “to enjoy the work rather than dread the process.” She credited senior faculty not only with advising junior colleagues to avoid excessive service obligations, but also with stepping up to actively fill those roles.

Leydet advised junior colleagues to seek out mentors who have navigated parenthood in academia, rather than those who have not. “Mentorship was very important—identifying faculty members who had gone through what I wanted to go through and taking their advice. I still am at their doors every day, even as a tenured faculty member, seeking their advice as their children grow.”  Not all colleagues were helpful warned  Horton: “There were certain faculty that we learned were toxic themselves. And they would say things, and you just have to ignore it.”

Horton emphasized the importance of not waiting for a crisis to communicate openly with supervisors.  “You do not need to carry the burden of your job when major life issues like this are happening. They will at least give you the space to take care of it.”

Advice for Those in the “Hard Season”

Panelists offered encouragement to those simultaneously navigating the most demanding phases of academic life and early parenthood. “No one is in your situation,” said Leydet, urging “Don’t compare [yourself] to anybody else. Do what feels right and move that forward.”

Kloster reflected on setting boundaries.  “Something I’m working on is saying no more. It’s really hard right now, but it’s also the best job in the world, and there’s nothing else I’d rather be doing.”

Eisenbies, reflecting on what has sustained his marriage through years of uncertainty, focused on partnership.   “I just hope whoever’s listening that they meet somebody who has shared values with you. Every argument that we have ends with ‘I love you,’ even when we’re still annoyed with each other.”

Recommendations for the Academy

Beaupre offered concrete suggestions for institutional improvement: “Spring break at the university should match spring break in the school district….[More] grants should be able to have extensions [for family leave].”

Caregiver funding available to pre-tenure faculty attending conferences is not currently accessible to graduate students (or postdocs), a gap Beaupre described as inequitable given that graduate researchers are often at the prime age for starting families. 

In a nutshell:

                     Childcare is the central constraint: availability and affordability drive daily logistics, career decisions, and stress.

                     Support networks matter: being far from family amplifies challenges, especially with health and neurodiversity-related care needs.  Friends and community—including workplaces-- can be lifelines.

                     Career structures can help or hurt: clear tenure/P&T expectations, travel support, mentoring, and funding flexibility reduce uncertainty; soft-money roles add instability;

                     Boundaries and values are protective: prioritizing family time, saying no, and resisting comparison were recurring coping approaches.

Panelists’ experiences and recommendations point to the same goal: make family life less of a private obstacle course and more of a responsibility shared by institutions.

For campus and community resources, visit the Family Resources website

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Women in STEM Panel Celebrates Diverse Career Journeys

Panelists, left to right:  Jill, Erica , Sue and Katherine. Erica is speaking, and gesturing with her hands.  The others are facing her, listening to her response.
Jill Rahn, Erica Wood, Sue Fassler, and Katherine Hobbs
SYRACUSE, N.Y., March 24, 2026 — The ESF Women’s Caucus hosted an intimate and energizing Women in STEM Panel Discussion and Mixer this week, bringing together students, employees, and alumni for an evening of candid storytelling, mentorship, and community building. Four accomplished ESF alumnae in science and sustainability fields shared personal, diverse career journeys – highlighting how perseverance, authenticity, and community support helped them navigate their education and professional development.

Moderated by student leaders Bella Francisco (Biotechnology ’26) and Chloe Beaupre (PhD candidate, Animal Movement and Spatial Ecology), the panel featured four ESF professionals whose diverse paths reflect the breadth of STEM careers:

    artists rendition of 4 girls, aspiring to different scientific fields, beneath a banner that reads "Women in STEM Panel discussion and mixer, Tuesday March 24, 3:30-5pm, 24 Marshall"
  • ·       Jill Rahn (BS 2015, Forest Ecosystem Sci; MS 2017 For Management), Forest Resources Analyst, Forest Properties, based at the college’s Heiberg Forest
  • ·       Erica Wood (MS Env Biology 2025 Foci:  Botany, in partnership with Indigenous Nations), Plant Restoration Project Manager, Center for Native Peoples and the Environment
  • ·       Sue Fassler (BS 2012 ,MPS 2014 Env Sci), ESF’s Director of Sustainability
  • ·       Katherine Hobbs (MPS 2006 Env Comm & Participatory Processes), Contracts and Compliance Business Manager, Office of Sustainable Facilities & Operations

Diverse Paths: Panelists each illuminated a unique path in STEM. From transferring colleges or switching majors to returning to graduate school after a decade in the workforce, their stories showed that there is no single “right” path to success. Despite career pivots, detours, and even setbacks like layoffs and false starts, each speaker ultimately found a fulfilling role at their alma mater aligned with their passion for science and the environment. Their journeys underscored a common message: persistence, self-belief, and a supportive community can propel women to thrive in STEM.

Resilience and Authenticity in Focus: Throughout the discussion, themes of resilience and emotional authenticity took center stage. Panelists spoke openly about overcoming self-doubt and societal pressures in fields where women are often underrepresented. Jill Rahn candidly recalled a crisis of confidence she faced early in her career. By continually challenging herself – even taking on public speaking duties she once found daunting – Rahn transformed those nerves into new strength. “Practice… the things that make you the most uncomfortable,” she advised, noting that even if a challenge feels impossible at the beginning, it will get easier each time.

Embracing Emotional Intelligence as a Strength: “I would say that it is okay to be emotional,” added Sue Fassler, urging women never to hide their feelings in professional settings. “Let’s normalize having human moments in the workplace… It’s okay to feel emotions,” she said, emphasizing that empathy can be “a superpower… our capacity to feel.” Fassler’s point resonated with the audience, reinforcing a key sentiment of the night – that authenticity and passion are assets in leadership, not liabilities.

Mentorship and Community Support: Another recurring theme was the critical role of mentors and a supportive network. “If you’re able to, be really picky about your team. Try to work with people whose values align with yours. When you’re on a team that “gets” you and respects what you bring, it’s a lot easier to set boundaries and be yourself,” advised Erica Wood, who credited strong female mentors for much of her growth. Working with “really strong, supportive women” has made an enormous difference in her success, Wood noted. Jill Rahn likewise stressed the importance of women uplifting one another: “We women are really good at supporting each other, and we need to keep doing that. If you feel that pang of envy or self-doubt when you see another woman excel, use it as motivation. Turn it into a learning opportunity. But start with celebration. When one of us wins, we all do,” she observed, underscoring the event’s emphasis on community and mutual encouragement.  Hobbs reiterated this with “Find your niche and your allies, and keep doing the good work you’re doing.”

Challenges Persist for Women in STEM.  Panelists discussed experiences with being underestimated, talked over, or dismissed—especially early in their careers. They also spoke about navigating age dynamics, microaggressions, and the pressure to prove themselves.  Katherine Hobbs shared “learning how to grow a thick skin without becoming hardened—to grow a callus without becoming calcified. In other words, you do have to toughen up a bit—because the world isn’t always kind—but you don’t want to lose your empathy or become cynical.”

SelfCare and Balance Are Essential: Speakers urged students to protect their wellbeing, honor personal boundaries, and recognize that careers unfold in seasons. Wood reminded the audience that “Activism and STEM careers alike can be draining, so make sure you refill your own cup. In a world that often demands women to work harder for equal recognition, sometimes rest is a form of resistance. If you need to rest, listen to your body and rest.” 

Empowering the Next Generation: In closing remarks, Katherine Hobbs reminded attendees to lead with compassion and solidarity. We can’t lose sight of [our] humanity… everything we do is about relationships; that’s what makes us strong,” Hobbs said, urging the next ge
neration of women in STEM to be “there for each other” and to pursue their careers with heart.  “Don’t lose sight of why you care.”  Following the panel, participants continued to share their stories and advice during an informal mixer over refreshments, embodying the supportive spirit that defined the night. 

About the Event: The Women in STEM Panel was organized by the ESF Women’s Caucus as part of its ongoing mission to foster community, mentorship, and empowerment for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at ESF. The uplifting discussion and networking mixer left the campus community and alumnae inspired – a testament to the strength of authenticity, resilience, and mutual support in shaping successful career journeys in STEM.

Refreshments were provided by the Mighty Oaks Student Assembly (MOSA) and the Auxiliary Services Corporation.

For more formal and informal opportunities to network, visit the program schedule at http://www.esf.edu/womenscaucus


Thursday, February 26, 2026

SUNY Upstate Professor Urges Scientists to Embrace Civic Engagement Amid Rising Science Skepticism


Women with arm resting, standing outdoors with a building behind
 Sarah C. Reckess, J.D., HEC-C
In a compelling and timely address, Professor Sarah Reckess, SUNY Upstate Medical University, called on scientists to step beyond the lab and engage directly with their communities to combat growing public skepticism toward science.

Professor Reckess—a legal scholar and ethics consultant—shared personal stories and national data to illustrate the urgent need for scientists to become “civic scientists.”

“We know more science than any people in the history of the world,” Reckess said. “And yet, we’re seeing more uncertainty and skepticism than ever before. That’s a paradox we can’t ignore.”

Reckess opened with a personal anecdote about her pet goat, Pixie, who nearly died in 2020 when the deworming medication ivermectin was unavailable due to widespread misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic. “My goat needed this medicine, and there was none on the shelves,” she recalled. 

The story served as a springboard into a broader discussion about misinformation, the replication crisis in science, and the erosion of public trust. Reckess emphasized that while scientists are widely viewed as intelligent, only 45% of Americans consider them good communicators. “Here’s our problem,” she said. “We’re not just facing a trust crisis—we’re facing a communication crisis.”

She challenged scientists to rethink their role in society, urging them to engage in two-way conversations with the public. “What we thought communication meant was that we should just provide information. But there hasn’t been enough listening and collaborating,” she said.

Reckess highlighted the importance of civic engagement at all levels—from volunteering at school science fairs to briefing policymakers and even running for office. “Only 3% of state-level elected officials have a background in science, healthcare, or engineering,” she noted. “Wouldn’t it be great if there was a five in front of that number?”

She also offered practical advice for scientists looking to improve their outreach: “Can you explain your research in three sentences? Two? One? Can you remove the jargon and make it matter to someone who hasn’t been in school for 30 years?”

Despite the challenges, Reckess ended on a hopeful note. “The public wants to hear from you. They don’t necessarily want you to run the country, but they do want you whispering in the ears of those who do.”

For more information or to connect with Professor Reckess, she encourages students and colleagues to reach out: “Please don’t be a stranger. Email me or come down the hill—I’ll meet you for lunch if you want to talk.”

Recorded Presentation

About the Speaker:  Sarah C. Reckess, J.D., HEC-C, is an Assistant Professor at Upstate Medical University Norton College of Medicine in the Center for Bioethics and Humanities. Prof. Reckess works at the intersection of policy, law and bioethics and the on-call ethics consultant for area hospitals.

Professor Reckess earned her Juris Doctorate at Syracuse University College of Law, with a concentration in Family Law and Social Policy.  She is licensed to practice law in New York State and in the U.S. Supreme Court. She co- co-director of the Syracuse Medical Legal Partnership, a collaboration between the Center for Bioethics + Humanities, University Pediatric and Adolescent Clinic (UPAC), and Syracuse University College of Law. This interdisciplinary clinic places student attorneys in the pediatric clinic to address legal issues impacting child health outcomes, including unsafe housing related to lead, mold, and asthma.

About the series:

This event was part of the Adaptive Peaks Seminar Series, organized by ESF's Department of Environmental Biology, and the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions (WiSE) Speaker Series, organized by the ESF Women’s Caucus. For upcoming events, please visit the college calendar.

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Know Before You Go: Career Fair Edition a success!

Graduate student showing younger students notes

A week before the Spring Career and Internship Fair, the ESF Women's Caucus and GSA hosted a casual, drop-in student advising session focused on careers and graduate school.  Undergraduate students from were invited for "honest conversations with grad students, practical advice, and food."  

Organizers shared "We no idea how many people to expect, or what topics to anticipate. Waves of undergrads showed up, almost all unsure what to ask or where to begin. 
"That so many grad students took the time to patiently talk them through to figure out those questions is an amazing testament to their collective care and consideration.  The number of undergrads that stopped in and stayed long after the pizza was gone says a lot, too, about their appreciation of the grads time and experience, and how much they needed a place to figure out what to ask."

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Sims Speaks on Title IX and Campus Safety

By Amberlyn Guzman, Forest Management, B.S. ‘28

Toyia Sims, interim Title IX Coordinator, led a powerful and informative discussion on Title IX and its role in preventing sexual harassment at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF) on April 8, 2025, as part of the college's Perspectives of Career and Gender course in-class conversation section available to other student and faculty. The discussion was solely led by Sims.

Sims’s presentation offered a clear overview of Title IX, a federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. She explained how ESF implements Title IX policies to create a safe and inclusive learning and working environment. Through a combination of legal explanation, real-world examples, and discussion-based engagement, Sims highlighted the pathways available for students, faculty, and staff to report concerns, seek resources, and access support services confidentially.

The discussion emphasized the preventative aspects of Title IX compliance, including mandatory training, awareness campaigns, and responsive institutional processes that protect the rights and well-being of all campus members, while also allowing room for students to verbalize their questions and concerns about how Title IX operates.

The discussion ended with questions from Sims that highlighted the things we learned during the conversation of not just about Title IX, but also harassment and discomfort in professional settings, and how to identify, seek support, and take steps toward resolution and healing within a safe and respectful campus environment.

Toyia Sims earned a BA from Columbia College in 2002. She has been Senior Personnel Associate within ESF's Human Resources office since 2023.

For more information about, ESF's Title IX process, please visit https://www.esf.edu/administration/titleix. For upcoming public events, visit https://www.esf.edu/calendar/

As part of the requirements for FOR 797, Perspective on Career and Gender students share responsibility of reporting on a subset of class discussions.


 

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

From Nerves to Know-How: Guest Speaker Equips Students with Winning Interview Strategies

By Aayusha Chapagain, Department of Sustainable Resource Management, May 2025

 

Meredith smiling
Meredith Chase
Meredith Chase, the Assistant Director at ESF Career Services, served as a guest lecturer FOR 797, delivering a dynamic and informative session on interview preparation and career readiness. The session provided students with valuable strategies and reflections to boost confidence and competence in navigating the job search process.

The guest speaker emphasized the importance of self-assessment, encouraging students to evaluate their interests, skills, personalities, and reflect on their past experiences, present strengths, and future goals. This self-awareness, she explained, is crucial in tackling difficult interview questions such as, "What is your greatest weakness?" or "Tell me about a time you resolved a workplace conflict." These often-uncomfortable questions require thoughtful, honest responses that present the candidate in a constructive light.

She also addressed practical elements of interview preparation, including how to craft a concise, focused cover letter, highlighting that not everything can (or should) be included in one document. Chase recommends printing each job announcement and marking it up with specific examples of the the required experiences or skills. 
The importance of networking was another key topic, where she emphasized the advantage of “knowing someone on the inside” to help open doors into competitive organizations.

The session further explored how to develop and polish interview skills, such as controlling hand movements, maintaining eye contact, and using confident body language. She provided guidance on evaluating job offers, stressing the importance of asking to complete the interview before discussing salary. Salary negotiation, she noted, is often challenging, but students were encouraged to aim for the higher end of the pay scale, for example, targeting $50,000 in a $45,000–$50,000 range, since employers often start with the lower figure.

Finally, the speaker highlighted the importance of asking questions at the end of the interview, reminding students that this part is equally critical and should be planned in advance rather than thought up on the spot.

The session was widely praised for being relatable, practical, and empowering. Students left feeling significantly more prepared and confident for their future interviews, equipped with both strategic knowledge and a clearer understanding of themselves as candidates.

As part of the requirements for FOR 797, Perspective on Career and Gender students share responsibility of reporting on a subset of class discussions.

 

Thursday, March 6, 2025

Advice for navigating male dominated fields from women in STEM for women in STEM

By Rhia Henderson, Environmental Biology, MS ‘26

At the Women in STEM virtual event Director of ESF Alumni Relations, Debbie Caviness, interviewed four successful ESF alumni who have established themselves in STEM fields about their advice and challenges they’ve faced as women in STEM. This conversation took place on March 6, 2025, with Billie Holecek ’20, Valerie Wiehl ’16, Emily Booth ’21, and Ally Berry ’19.

During this conversation Caviness presented the alumnae with a variety of questions with a focus on the challenges that have overcome as women in male dominated STEM fields. Berry encouraged listeners to “make space for themselves and find mentorship” which the other speakers agreed with wholeheartedly. Another point of discussion was what the speakers would give as advice to women thinking of pursuing STEM field and what classes they had during their time at ESF that has supported them throughout their careers, to which each speaker gave complete and powerful responses from each of their varied perspectives. The classes highlighted by each speaker were individual to each of their majors, and included Energy Markets and Policy, Remote Sensing, Python Coding, and Mycology to state a few that the speakers noted as key classes that changed their perspectives. A common theme for advice across the speakers was to find allies in each space, maintain mentorship and networks, and to stand up for yourself (especially during negotiations).

Billie Holecek graduated from ESF in 2020 with a bachelor's in Sustainable Energy Management and a minor in Applied Statistics and Energy and Environmental Policy. She currently works for the Berkeley Lab as an Energy and Environmental Policy Researcher while completing her masters in Energy and Environmental Policy at University of Delaware.

Valerie Wiehl graduated from ESF in 2016 with a bachelor’s in Environmental Resources and Engineering where she was interested in engineering focused on water dynamics. In her professor career she had landed in robotics and now works as a Customer Success Engineering Lead for Nightingale Security, using drones that respond to calls under emergency circumstances.

Emily Booth graduated from ESF in 2021 with a bachelor’s in Forest Health where she worked with Dr. Dylan Parry on projects surrounding biological control methods. She now works for the city of Rochester as a Forestry Technician where she manages 1/3 of the 65,000 trees in the city.

Ally Berry entered ESF as a transfer student from Onondaga Community College and graduated in 2019 with a bachelor’s in Environmental Science with a specialization in watershed science. She now works as an Environmental Project Manager for LG Sonic US to monitor and mitigate harmful algal blooms around the US.

This discussion was part of the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions (WiSE Professions) Speaker series as a special installment for Women’s History Month. It was presented jointly by the Alumni Association, Career Services, Admissions, and ESF Women’s Caucus.

As part of the requirements for FOR 797, Perspective on Career and Gender students share responsibility of reporting on a subset of class discussions, including those that are part of the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions Speaker Series (WiSE Professions).

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Environmental Education: Holding Space for Queerness

By Henry McKenna, Environmental Studies '25.

Environmental education has long provided spaces for personal growth and identity exploration, particularly in residential summer camps. On February 25, 2025, Alexandra Walls and Dr. Michael Mikulewicz presented ‘Queering Camp’ during a combined Science Corps Workshop and Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions Speaker Series event. This presentation explored the role of summer camps and outdoor learning programs in supporting queer youth and fostering inclusive environmental education spaces.

"I prefer to be a realist," said Walls, in reference to the current administration that is enforcing dangerous policies for the LGBTQ+ community. A former camper turned camp educator, Walls pointed out the lack of understanding on queerness in environmental education overnight camps. Walls gave an enlightening perspective on how to “queer
” your thinking, by changing things like housing in order to provide a more comforting experience for students and campers. 

Alex on some kind of water craft, with glasses on the top of her head and holding out a crab to the camera
Mikulewicz, an assistant professor of Environmental Studies at the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF), uses queer theory and critical geography to examine the inequalities embedded in climate impacts and responses. Together, they challenged traditional frameworks in environmental education and advocated for spaces where all identities are affirmed. Mikulewicz defined gender and queerness brilliantly, while providing a digestible definitions to complex ideas.  He explained that the term “Queering” started “with heteronormism being questioned by theorists, scholars, activists, etcetera” but has come to mean “decentering anything from the norm” or the binaries upon which society is built. 
head and shoulders photo of Michael


The concept of queer eco pedagogies involves questioning underlying assumptions in environmental education, overcoming harmful binaries, and being attentive to intersectionality.  Walls and Mikulewicz argue that these ideas and values are not at all limited to queer learners or teachers, but rather are universally applicable.

For more information on upcoming public ESF events, visit www.esf.edu.   

As part of the requirements for FOR 797, Perspective on Career and Gender students share responsibility of reporting on a subset of class discussions, including those that are part of the Women in Scientific and Environmental Professions Speaker Series (WiSE Professions).